| « HIV vaccine & race | Gene Expression Front Page | Of things brown » | |
|
February 24, 2003
THE BELL CURVE & the blogsphere
I've been working & dealing with the fact that my laptop fried this weekend (getting used to working my clunky desktop back up until I can get the laptop situation figured out). So I've missed out on the big debate that sprouted this weekend about THE BELL CURVE & racism and IQ and all that.... So, see here Charles Murtaugh's opinion, Matthew Yglesias, Kevin Drum, Atrios, Brad Delong, 6th International, Nathan Newman, Kieran Healy.... Not much I'm going to say right now, don't have the time, but perhaps later. I'm sure GNXP readers can have fun on the boards of these sites. Update:
Posted by razib at
06:39 PM
Just went to Atrios, who I had never perused, and looked at the comments following his link to one of Fred Reed's pieces - and all I can say is, I see more and more why Fred hightailed it to Mexico. The level of discourse in this country just gets lower and lower... Posted by: jimbo at February 24, 2003 06:58 PMAnd who were those lonely IQ champions that set this spark a-blazing? (Ok that's probably an exaggeration, but everyone on the right and left wouldn't be tripping over themselves to attack 'the bell curve, at such a random point in the book's history, if no one had publicly defended it.) Posted by: Jason Malloy at February 24, 2003 07:24 PMAfter seeing Jason's eloquent response to Scott at Yglesias's blog, I am convinced the left is/will lose this debate over IQ. Seeing Atrios's cumbersome rejoinder on his blog or Mac Diva's histrionics wherever he goes, I am more convinced of that. No doubt the left will still be potent enough to scare the sh@t out of many timid IQ researchers, but this will only work in places like the US, where we actually give a sh@t about PC. As Godless predicted, this debate will really be won in countries like China that have the intellectual capital and, soon, the economic firepower to do serious GE- and, for better or worse, a much less regard to its ethical considerations. The left will figure out the growing irrelevance (due to demographics and other economic factors) of the US/EU- not necessarily now but very likely within this century. What the (bleep) will the left do when no one cares or can do anything about their causes? Posted by: -R at February 24, 2003 08:11 PMUnlike most of those who discuss the Bell Curve, I've actually read it, and I found it fascinating and well-written. It is regrettable that Murray and Herrnstein were known to have racial views, and even more regrettable that race was mentioned in the book. This turned debate about the book's main ideas to discussions of race, which are nearly always emotional and unproductive. By far the most important idea in the book was independent of race entirely - the strong and strongly researched link between intelligence and social behaviour. (Most of the book analyzes data from a long-term study of Caucasians.) The fact that low intelligence is a leading indicator of criminality, violence, lack of civility, and poor parenting was suspected before but has now been clearly shown. The implications are significant for policymakers, philosophers, pundits, and thoughtful people everywhere, particularly in a world where the average intelligence level is steadily dropping. I urge anyone interested in these issues to actually read the book, it is well worth your time even if you are unconvinced by or opposed to the authors' views. Ole P.S. I am personally so concerned about the unfortunate combination of dropping intelligence with the correlation of low intelligence to poor social behavior that I'm writing a book about it, to be called Unnatural Selection. Please see http://w-uh.com/ if you're interested... Posted by: ole at February 24, 2003 08:33 PMFun Charles Murray Factoid: I met his daughter once. She's half-Thai. Posted by: Whackadoodle at February 25, 2003 12:25 PMhe has two that are half-thai. he once said that they are just like any other american girls, except they are better looking since they are eurasian! btw, their mother is of chinese thai extraction.... Posted by: razib at February 25, 2003 01:38 PMWhat's up with white male race-realists and their asian wives?: Brand, Derbyshire, Rushton, Murray... Is it that people who think about race are more likely to fetishize it so that it becomes an important factor in their mate selection, or is it that race-realist idea of superior asian intellect , that sends them looking for that quality Eastern DNA for their children? Or is it just that scientists and intellectuals are more likely to be skinny nerds, so they have to head toward frailer pastures? (the only one of those who I've seen a picture of is Derbyshire, and he looks like a skinny nerd) PS- (Somewhat related), Did anyone read the comment box on Atrios' 1st Bell Curve post where the troll Mac Diva told Murtaugh that his marriage to an asian wife was the equivalent to a slave-owner sexually abusing his slaves? It was among the most fucked-up things I've read anywhere. Mac Diva has a lot of nerve shouting hate at anybody. Posted by: Jason Malloy at February 25, 2003 02:32 PMOr is it just that scientists and intellectuals are more likely to be skinny nerds, so they have to head toward frailer pastures? ..And of course, will naturally pair-up with smarter people. My mother went to Cornell in up-state NY, and, it seemed the entire student body was comprised of East Asian women. Posted by: Jason Malloy at February 25, 2003 02:39 PMi don't know if murray qualifies as a nerd, he's soft spoken, but not particularly slight or robust. look up rushton's pic at his uni-he looks a bit sinister in it.... Posted by: razib at February 25, 2003 02:42 PMlook up rushton's pic at his uni-he looks a bit sinister in it.... Probably not as sinister as he looks in Rolling Stones Professors of HATE, where they photoshop him into a cathedral-headed goblin. Posted by: Jason Malloy at February 25, 2003 03:08 PMDo you forget Ed. Miller too Posted by: Juan ascaņo at February 25, 2003 09:17 PMYou sure about Rushton having an Asian wife? I know he likes to go to American Renaissance conferences, that would seem quite strange indeed if he's married to a non-white... Posted by: Oleg at February 25, 2003 10:56 PM"What's up with white male race-realists and their asian wives?: Brand, Derbyshire, Rushton, Murray..." I noticed that too (with the exception of Rushton - i had no idea his wife was asian). I have a Taiwanese gf, she's probably gonna be my wife. I know alot of white dudes that are not familiar with the IQ advantage of asians over whites, but they still have an asian fetish. Before i moved to Toronto I didn't have a thing for asian women - I actually used to ask my white buddies what the big deal was - it sort of just grew on me when i moved to Hogtown. It wasn't until about two years ago that i became familiar with Heterosis and it wasn't until 2 years ago that i began to realize that the IQ superiority of asians is most likely due to genes. Posted by: the alpha male at February 25, 2003 11:02 PMHey! Hey! Hey! As to the Asian wives, my ideas are in the Brand/Rushton mould and I have even contributed a couple of papers to that literature but all 4 of my wives had/have blue eyes! Incidentally, I once knew a neo-Nazi whose best friend was a very dark Bengali. "Just a brown European" was his defence of his friend. And I knew another bloke who hated "slopes" (east asians) who was married to a Filipina. All surely a heartening testimony to the triumph of realism over prejudice! Posted by: John Ray at February 27, 2003 05:02 AM |
|
|
|
|