| « ADAM'S CURSE | Gene Expression Front Page | Prop 54 » | |
|
October 07, 2003
The Passion
Greg Easterbrook has a perspective on The Passion that I think is pretty on-the-mark, neither lionizing Gibson, nor falling behind the ADL's screaming. I had to debate whether to put this in the "politics" or "religion" category-I decided to put it in "politics."
Posted by razib at
12:10 PM
I decided to put it in "politics." Good decision. As far as I can tell the whole dust-up over The Passion has little whatever to do with religion. "Gibson is asserting his work is "the truth," historically accurate in the factual sense. Jesus . . . died, and rose again to redeem the sins of the world; that, I feel sure, is truth. ***Everything else is speculation***." ??!! Do religious folk ever, ever stop and feel just a little bit guilty about all the intellectual integrity they must compromise to maintain their (social) belief systems? Posted by: Jason Malloy at October 7, 2003 05:14 PMThat was a pretty strange line, even from a believer, too bad TNR's editors didn't pick up on it. Posted by: Scott at October 7, 2003 06:08 PMnope-childhood sexual urges leave them with enough guilt to last a lifetime. i don't mind gibson movies for what it's worth-yes, they are moralistic sometimes, but so are many movies, though from a different political slant. there aren't many libertarian atheist movies out there-so i'm not picky on politics.... (and sometimes politics is hard to pick up-did you get that logan's run was a conservative tale cautioning against social engineering???) Posted by: razib at October 8, 2003 10:48 AMHow does the new "Luther" movie deal with his antisemitism? I haven't seen it myself yet - curious to know how this tricky subject is dealt with Posted by: ToOmUcHWoRk at October 8, 2003 06:47 PM |
|
|
|
|