| « First No-Vaccine Rabies Survivor | Gene Expression Front Page | What has one to do with the other? » | |
|
November 26, 2004
No admixture with Neanderthals?
In any case, the conclusions in the article above shouldn't be that surprising, Out-of-Africa always seemed to be on strongest ground in the European case. Not only do the geneticists tend to favor Out-of-Africa (replacement), skull & bones paleontologists like Chris Stringer based the model in particular using the replacement of H. neanderthalis in Europe as a case study. Of course, this European case does not mean that I retract my contention that things are rather unsettled in paleoanthropology at the moment (the authors of the paper alluded to the possibility of mtDNA selective sweep, but only to dismiss it), we may find that rather than a unitary model we might have to simply live with regional explanations. (via Dienekes) 1 - Retrieved Neanderthal and Paleolithic H. sapien mtDNA seems to point to the likelihood that no mtDNA from the former has persisted into modern populations.
Posted by razib at
12:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|