« Maladapted to our Habitat | Gene Expression Front Page | Interesting HapMap Graph »
December 09, 2004

Births, voting and Wogs

We now all now about Steve Sailer's story in the American conservative comparing State's White Fertility rates and the likelyhood of that state going for Bush in the last election. As a followup to this story, Dave Kopel guest-blogging at Glennreynolds.com points out Kos, of the Arch-leftist blog DailyKos, trying to spin this as the inherent immorality of the red states.

When Red States get their social problems under control, and things such as teen pregnancy down to nationwide lows, then they can try and foist their solutions on the rest of the country.

But as things currently stand, on this issue (as well as others like divorce), the Red States have no ground to stand on. Those crazy New Englad [sic] liberals are running circles around them in this tangible measure of their residents’ “values”.

I think this needs to be commented on since it is an example of the rampant political bigotry arising on the left, it is also important to show the creation of the new wog for the left, red-staters.

The etymology of the term "wog" shows it to come from England during their time of exploration and colonization. It is a term meaning "other" and implying to those it is used upon that they are; less than human, unintelligent, and immoral. If you take the recent "IQ by state vs. candidate preference" hoax, combine with Kos' own words showing he thinks red-staters are immoral "When Red States get their social problems under control" and less-than-human (i.e. not worthy of contributing to a national debate in a democracy) "then they can try and foist their solutions on the rest of the country.", one can see that he (and the left as a whole) considers the Bush voters as Wogs.

This is simple bigotry and, for a healthy democracy, it must stop.

Posted by scottm at 07:17 PM