Since
the previous post was about the tendency toward radical skepticism and subjectivism within cultural anthropology, I thought I would point to
this piece in
The Economist which highlights
positive insights from various anthropological fields. The article emphasizes the possible role that population pressure and the quest for food might have had in spurring human innovation, from the
atlatl to agriculture. An interesting point to note is the implicit suggestion that high rates of hunter-gatherer warfare might have constrained population pressure and possibly lead to relatively higher standards of living; something familiar from
Greg Clark's model. From a population genetic angle, I am curious as to whether the endemic warfare of cultures which were pre-state resulted in higher or lower
Nm*?
*
N = population,
m = migration rate.
Nm > 1 results in equilibration of allele frequencies across demes, while
Nm < 1 tends to lead to divergence.
Labels: anthropology