<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sports political donations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnxp.com/new/2006/07/28/sports-political-donations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2006/07/28/sports-political-donations/</link>
	<description>Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 05:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGGP</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2006/07/28/sports-political-donations/#comment-12463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TGGP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan Caplan says that increases in wealth have little effect on political orientation. If politics are mostly about social issues (which apparently used to be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/05/back_to_normal.html&quot;&gt;norm&lt;/a&gt; and may be again) he might have a point.&#160;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/05/how_does_winnin.html&quot;&gt;http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/05/how_does_winnin.html&lt;/a&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2005/04/a_little_eviden.html#000841&quot;&gt;http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2005/04/a_little_evi&lt;wbr&gt;den.html#000841&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan Caplan says that increases in wealth have little effect on political orientation. If politics are mostly about social issues (which apparently used to be the <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/05/back_to_normal.html">norm</a> and may be again) he might have a point.&nbsp;<br /><a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/05/how_does_winnin.html">http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2006/05/how_does_winnin.html</a>&nbsp;<br /><a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2005/04/a_little_eviden.html#000841"></a><a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2005/04/a_little_evi" rel="nofollow">http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2005/04/a_little_evi</a><wbr>den.html#000841</wbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razib</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2006/07/28/sports-political-donations/#comment-12464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[razib]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; wealthiest players&lt;/i&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;as kris rock said: players are &lt;i&gt;rich&lt;/i&gt;, owners are &lt;i&gt;wealthy&lt;/i&gt; :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> wealthiest players</i>&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />as kris rock said: players are <i>rich</i>, owners are <i>wealthy</i> :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbartlog</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2006/07/28/sports-political-donations/#comment-12465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbartlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you look at the amounts it&#039;s interesting to see how much more the owners, commissioners and so on donate than even the wealthiest players. Of course this is partly because those guys have even more money than even the wealthiest players, but I think it also speaks to their need to buy influence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the amounts it&#8217;s interesting to see how much more the owners, commissioners and so on donate than even the wealthiest players. Of course this is partly because those guys have even more money than even the wealthiest players, but I think it also speaks to their need to buy influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2006/07/28/sports-political-donations/#comment-12466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Sports&quot; skew Republican in the way that &quot;Celebrities&quot; skew Democratic. The &quot;Media&quot; category appears to have been picked non-randomly for balance. In states where voter registration is a matter of public record, journalists skew Democratic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sports&#8221; skew Republican in the way that &#8220;Celebrities&#8221; skew Democratic. The &#8220;Media&#8221; category appears to have been picked non-randomly for balance. In states where voter registration is a matter of public record, journalists skew Democratic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
