Human ⇒ Ape?

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Email this to someoneTweet about this on Twitter

A Human Ancestor for the Apes?



  1. Kingsley was right!

  2. So, we really are living on the planet of the Apes. 
    This humaniod ancester to the apes, was it somehow related to Charlton Heston? 
    “Get your paws off me you damn, dirty apes!”

  3. Ugh. First, deciding whether the ancestor of humans and apes was an ape or a human seems silly. Does he mean to imply that we modern humans could interbreed with the common ancestor of both (and therefore are conspecific), but modern chimps could not? Yikes. 
    An upright ancestor, ok. That ain’t a human by a longshot. If his title was, “A bipedal ancestor for the apes?” then I wouldn’t be twirling my finger by my temple.

  4. The fossil record for apes is so poor that the few available fossils are grossly overinterpreted.

  5. Some people seem to be going human-shit about this.

  6. The most parsimonious explanation, to me, seems to be that his spine character is entirely unrelated to bipedalism, and is simply a hominoid symplesiomorphy. …If this is the case it would have the unfortunate effect of making the guy’s PhD thesis irrelevant. 
    That said, there is no question that the origin of bipedalism and knuckle-walking are greatly problematic. There are no knuckle-walking fossils. Why?