<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gender bias in publications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/01/22/gender-bias-in-publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/01/22/gender-bias-in-publications/</link>
	<description>Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 05:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EW</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/01/22/gender-bias-in-publications/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How exactly do they make submitters anonymous? A single self-reference says at least which lab the submitter is from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly do they make submitters anonymous? A single self-reference says at least which lab the submitter is from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agnostic</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/01/22/gender-bias-in-publications/#comment-11280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agnostic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read about this at SB blog Living the Scientist Life, and read the paper. In short, there is no info on the sex make-up of the judges, referees, editors, etc., so there is no inference to be drawn about sexism. For all we know, female reviewers stopped being so hard on their same-sex competition.&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2008/01/women_science_and_writing.php#commentsArea&quot;&gt;http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2008/01/women_scienc&lt;wbr&gt;e_and_writing.php#commentsArea&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about this at SB blog Living the Scientist Life, and read the paper. In short, there is no info on the sex make-up of the judges, referees, editors, etc., so there is no inference to be drawn about sexism. For all we know, female reviewers stopped being so hard on their same-sex competition.&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br /><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2008/01/women_science_and_writing.php#commentsArea"></a><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2008/01/women_scienc" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2008/01/women_scienc</a><wbr>e_and_writing.php#commentsArea</wbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/01/22/gender-bias-in-publications/#comment-11281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forrest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is possible that the anonymity of the submitters is masking other factors that may or may not be related to their sex.  Academic credentials, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible that the anonymity of the submitters is masking other factors that may or may not be related to their sex.  Academic credentials, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
