<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New kind of diavlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/02/23/new-kind-of-diavlog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/02/23/new-kind-of-diavlog/</link>
	<description>Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 05:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Derbyshire</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/02/23/new-kind-of-diavlog/#comment-15421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Derbyshire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My review of A NEW KIND OF SCIENCE appeared in the print edition of National Review in 2002.  It&#039;s archived here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olimu.com/Journalism/2002/Texts/NewKindOfScience.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.olimu.com/Journalism/2002/Texts/NewKindOfScience.htm&lt;/a&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;--JD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My review of A NEW KIND OF SCIENCE appeared in the print edition of National Review in 2002.  It&#8217;s archived here <a href="http://www.olimu.com/Journalism/2002/Texts/NewKindOfScience.htm">http://www.olimu.com/Journalism/2002/Texts/NewKindOfScience.htm</a>&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />&#8211;JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John J Emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/02/23/new-kind-of-diavlog/#comment-15422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John J Emerson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#039;t read it, but Wolfram seems to have had the same editor as Gould. 1000-pp.-plus. &#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;There are over 300 Amazon reviews, with 80 fives, 101 ones, and 146 in between (only 40 twos). I&#039;ve never seen such an array, tending toward love hate but with more hate than love.&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;People might enjoy one of the ones (here complete):&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Anyone interested in finding out about the real nature of biological diversity should read &quot; The Structure of Evolutionary Theory&quot; by Stephen Jay Gould.&lt;/i&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;hat oughta make y&#039;all love Wolfram, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t read it, but Wolfram seems to have had the same editor as Gould. 1000-pp.-plus. &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />There are over 300 Amazon reviews, with 80 fives, 101 ones, and 146 in between (only 40 twos). I&#8217;ve never seen such an array, tending toward love hate but with more hate than love.&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />People might enjoy one of the ones (here complete):&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br /><i>Anyone interested in finding out about the real nature of biological diversity should read &#8221; The Structure of Evolutionary Theory&#8221; by Stephen Jay Gould.</i>&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />hat oughta make y&#8217;all love Wolfram, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
