<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genetic Relatedness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/06/18/genetic-relatedness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/06/18/genetic-relatedness/</link>
	<description>Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 05:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2008/06/18/genetic-relatedness/#comment-21373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely &#039;20th cousin&#039; is actually a very distant relationship (assuming it means a someone with one common ancestor 20 generations back).&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;In a population not composed of recent migrants, most people will be related by numerous moderately distant ancestors, sufficient to give an aggregate relatedness equivalent to about second-cousins.&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;But as I pointed out in one of my notes on Sewall Wright, if relatedness between two individuals is only &#039;average&#039; for the population they belong to, there is no correlation or regression between them relative to that population, therefore r for the purposes of Hamilton&#039;s Rule is zero.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely &#8217;20th cousin&#8217; is actually a very distant relationship (assuming it means a someone with one common ancestor 20 generations back).&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />In a population not composed of recent migrants, most people will be related by numerous moderately distant ancestors, sufficient to give an aggregate relatedness equivalent to about second-cousins.&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />But as I pointed out in one of my notes on Sewall Wright, if relatedness between two individuals is only &#8216;average&#8217; for the population they belong to, there is no correlation or regression between them relative to that population, therefore r for the purposes of Hamilton&#8217;s Rule is zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
