<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IQ &amp; neuroscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/03/26/iq-neuroscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/03/26/iq-neuroscience/</link>
	<description>Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 05:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Kosmatka</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/03/26/iq-neuroscience/#comment-7906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kosmatka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t DRD4 moderate cortical thickness?  It would be interesting to control this study for genotype at that locus and see if you get the same results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t DRD4 moderate cortical thickness?  It would be interesting to control this study for genotype at that locus and see if you get the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chemdude</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/03/26/iq-neuroscience/#comment-7907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chemdude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting study.  One might expect that &lt;i&gt;general&lt;/i&gt; intelligence would correlate to a factor (cortical thickness) that effects a large portion of the brain.  I would be interested to see a study of more specific subtypes of intelligence (eg. verbal), and see how brain structure effects that.  I find it interesting that the largest effect was in the parts of the brain that are communication hubs.  It&#039;s not so much that one part or parts of the brain work well, it&#039;s that the parts work well together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting study.  One might expect that <i>general</i> intelligence would correlate to a factor (cortical thickness) that effects a large portion of the brain.  I would be interested to see a study of more specific subtypes of intelligence (eg. verbal), and see how brain structure effects that.  I find it interesting that the largest effect was in the parts of the brain that are communication hubs.  It&#8217;s not so much that one part or parts of the brain work well, it&#8217;s that the parts work well together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bioIgnoramus</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/03/26/iq-neuroscience/#comment-7908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bioIgnoramus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does &quot;evidenced&quot; a link mean?  Shown?  Proved?  Demonstrated?  Established?&#160;&lt;br&gt;Why are people giving up using English - it&#039;s a perfectly serviceable language.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;evidenced&#8221; a link mean?  Shown?  Proved?  Demonstrated?  Established?&nbsp;<br />Why are people giving up using English &#8211; it&#8217;s a perfectly serviceable language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
