<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lives of the ancients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/08/25/lives-of-the-ancients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/08/25/lives-of-the-ancients/</link>
	<description>Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 05:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: razib</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/08/25/lives-of-the-ancients/#comment-23835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[razib]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[two thoughts&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;1) i named roman emperors of aristocratic pedigree because their ages are probably easiest to establish, since they are harder to make up post facto (e.g., the birth of a son to a roman consul would be noted by contemporaries). i suspect that some famous philosophers have had age-padding since we know so little of their original background to make them seem more extraordinary (there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that the ancients tended to be a lot more imprecise about age than we are today, again, excluding the births of notable people by virtue of their pedigree).&#160;&lt;br&gt;&#160;&lt;br&gt;2) it might be that only the aged could have acquired the encyclopediac level of knowledge via the small number of other philosophers &amp; as well as books (scrolls) to impress. what&#039;s the record of ancient prodigies?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two thoughts&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />1) i named roman emperors of aristocratic pedigree because their ages are probably easiest to establish, since they are harder to make up post facto (e.g., the birth of a son to a roman consul would be noted by contemporaries). i suspect that some famous philosophers have had age-padding since we know so little of their original background to make them seem more extraordinary (there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that the ancients tended to be a lot more imprecise about age than we are today, again, excluding the births of notable people by virtue of their pedigree).&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />2) it might be that only the aged could have acquired the encyclopediac level of knowledge via the small number of other philosophers &amp; as well as books (scrolls) to impress. what&#8217;s the record of ancient prodigies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simfish InquilineKea</title>
		<link>http://www.gnxp.com/new/2009/08/25/lives-of-the-ancients/#comment-23836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simfish InquilineKea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot (probably the majority) of ancient philosophers seem to have died at extremely advanced ages. While many of their birthdates are not known, records and depictions do depict them at advanced ages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot (probably the majority) of ancient philosophers seem to have died at extremely advanced ages. While many of their birthdates are not known, records and depictions do depict them at advanced ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
