Any particular reason you fail to mention the recent granting of an appeal to Simon Singh as to Eady's ruling on meaning? 
 
It would seem pertinent to your analysis of whether the ruling was unreasonable, particularly as Justice Laws described the ruling as "legally erroneous". 
 
Here for more details: 
 
http://jackofkent.blogspot.com/2009/11/bca-v-singh-court-of-appral-permission.html