Frightening Prospects

This sounds amazingly bad. Algis Kuliukas tells me that Elaine Morgan, leading spokesperson for the horrid “Aquatic Ape Theory”, has a new book out that, in his words, “takes on the accepted wisdom which has lead to each and every aspect of neo-Darwinism being accepted without question in some circles. From E O Wilson’s ‘Sociobiology: The New Synthesis’ through to Hamilton’s Kin Selection and Triver’s Reciprocal Altruism and associated game theories, she turns them over and revisits our assumptions about them. From Dawkins’ meme to ‘The Natural History of Rape’ and from Evolutionary Psychology to ‘The Blank Slate’, Elaine reminds us of anomalies and problems and provides tough, hard-nosed reasons not to get too carried away with all the hype.”

Morgan vs. Trivers and Hamilton. Can you imagine a debate thats anymore intellectually lopsided?

Posted by God Fearing Atheist at 09:56 PM

Posted in Uncategorized

"Divisive" Ethnic Species Names

Earlier this month, Turkey’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry altered the Latin names of three mammal species to expunge “divisive” reference to two of the country’s ethnic minorities — the Armenians and Kurds.

The Turkish red fox subspecies Vulpes vulpes kurdistanica will have its name cut down to just Vulpes vulpes, the deer Capreolus capreolus armenius will be Capreolus capreolus capreolus, and the sheep Ovis armeniana becomes Ovis orientalis anatolicus.

The Ministry’s statement alleges the names were handed out with “ill intent,” and although the official body of animal Linnean nomenclature, the ICZN, does not allow name changes for political reasons, spokespeople say this one might stick because the changes are “scientifically acceptable.”

[via Science (subscription required)]

Posted by God Fearing Atheist at 07:33 PM

Posted in Uncategorized

UK Social Trends

The UK’s Office for National Statistics has just published the annual survey of Social Trends in the UK. This provides (relatively) easily digested statistics and analysis on all aspects of the UK’s population and social life. The ONS website provides full access to the book here, either in bite-sized chunks or as the complete text. The latter is over 5Mb of pdf, so it takes a while to download (and a lot of disk space), but as the printed book costs £45, a free download is quite a bargain!

I would be interested to know whether the US (and other countries) have anything comparable.

Posted by David B at 04:00 AM

Posted in Uncategorized

NYT – Toward a Unified Theory of Black America

More from the New York Times: Toward a Unified Theory of Black America, from Stephen J. Dubner.  Interesting article about Economist Roland G. Fryer, an assistant professor at Harvard who has some pretty outspoken views.

“I want to have an honest discussion about race in a time and a place where I don’t think we can,” he says. ”Blacks and whites are both to blame.  As soon as you say something like, ‘Well, could the black-white test-score gap be genetics?’ everybody gets tensed up.  But why shouldn’t that be on the table?”

In addition to quoting Fryer’s controversial views, Dubner’s article itself has some:

The very issue of black-white inequality has, in recent years, been practically driven from public view.  But according to the data that Fryer lives with, the inequality itself hasn’t gone away.  There have been countless distractions — wars, economic gyrations, political turmoil — and, perhaps just as significantly, fatigue.  The proven voices and standard ideologies have lost much of their power.

Interesting especially in view of the Larry Summers flap, wherein the president of Harvard wondered aloud if genetics might explain why women are underrepresented in the sciences.

I’m not sure what is more interesting, Fryer, or the fact that the Times ran this article…

Posted by ole at 07:27 AM

Posted in Uncategorized

Race Does Exist — New York Times

Steve’s latest VDARE column is, in my opinion, a marvel of exposition. Nothing new, but like a fine wine you can move past the lack of novelty and appreciate the familiar but richly nuanced flavors.

One point that I think should be highlighted, especially in the context of Steve’s article which does much to strike a balance between stark typologies and the erasure of all variation due to clinal gradients, is the significance of “Wallace’s Line,” which putatively separates Asian and Australasian fauna in the popular imagination. In reality the chasm is not quite so stark, and many have suggested that between the Indo-Malayan and Oceanian biogeographic realms there is a transitional “Wallacean Realm.” Wallacea is bounded by Wallace’s Line on its west and Lydekker’s Line on its east, roughly the intersection of Indo-Malayan and Oceanian fauna. Wallacea’s existence as an intermediate region between Oceania and Indo-Malaya does not render the latter classifications invalid, rather, it reenforces the reality that nature does not conform to Platonic Ideals.1 Variation might be continuous, but, the rate of variation need not be constant.

1 – Recall that biologists actually dispute species concepts. The species is fundamental taxonomic unit, and yet even here there is an un-Platonic mess.

Posted by razib at 02:36 AM

Posted in Uncategorized

Advent of the Hive-mind

My friend Dymphna sent me this pdf, (one of her irish cousins is a co-author), on Constructing an Animat Mind Using 505 Sub-Minds from 234 Different Authors. Coolio. Animat looks like an excellent paradigm for growing a hive mind on the internet. Perhaps the Singularity is already underway. 😉
And then I looked at the bibliography.

I was struck by the ubiquitous presense of Sir Richard’s Blind Watchmaker. This probably is the book that has inspired more genetic algorithm design than any Cos Sci text. In this article from Wired,
NaturalMotion, a startup founded by former Oxford researchers Torsten Reil and Colm Massey, is ushering in a new age of digital animation. The company’s sole app, Endorphin, employs neural networks and artificial evolution to produce self-animating software robots that walk and run and fly with startling verisimilitude.
Two years before enrolling at Oxford, Reil read The Blind Watchmaker, the evolutionary biologist’s recasting of Darwin for the information age. “It was a turning point,” Reil says. “From then on, I was fascinated with biology.”
FYI, most of the 15,000 horses in LOTR:Return of the King were generated by Natural Motion, which is especially good at modelling cg horses. If we can now use the strong paradigms of evolutionary biology to create excellent cg horses, can excellent hive minds and brains be far behind?

Posted by jinnderella at 10:33 AM

Posted in Uncategorized

The evolution of Mormons

Deseret News has a long piece titled “Utah’s non-war over evolution.” It is somewhat rambling, but it should be viewed in light of the fact Ronald L. Numbers in The Creationists recounts that ‘In 1935 only 36 percent of the students at the Mormon’s Brighman Young University denied that humans have been “created in a process of evolution from lower forms.” By 1973 the figure had risen sharply to 81….’ The results at BYU might be due to decreased sample biasing as the student body increased in size, but, I think there is a real sociological process going on here: between 1930 and 1970 Mormons became, more or less, part of the American mainstream.1 And, to some extent they identified sociologically with conservative Protestants, who have been at the forefront of the “War against Evolution” since the rise of Darwinism in the United States.

But, note that the reporter is careful to highlight that the Latter Day Church’s teaching on the topic of evolutionary theory is far more circumspect and constrained than the perception of the seminary teachers who provide Mormon youth with their religious education. I have posted about Mormon peculiarities in the realm of belief when Protestantism is taken as normative before, but, I think the attitude toward evolution among the Mormon laity2 is a reflection of sociological forces buffetting them in the sea of American culture in which their peculiar beliefs have no great impact. Many of my classmates in high school were Mormon, and when I discussed evolutionary theory with them I would generally encounter less hostility than from my evangelical peers, but overall they were “unbelievers.” But, when I pressed them for theological or doctrinal justification for their position they could not produce anything, in contrast with evangelicals who often encountered Creationists literature at their church and so were ready with prefab talking points intelligible in their literalist worldview. My Mormon friends often ended up somewhat confused as to why they rejected evolutionary theory in the context of their religion, but I think the reality that my inquiries were exposing was that the Latter Day Saints are far more affected by the zeitgeist than they themselves are aware of.

This is I think part of a greater process of the canalization of various religious sects and denominations into a few broad rivers of practice and outlook in the United States. Because most Mormons have placed themselves within the “religious conservative” camp they have absorbed some talking points reflexively without further reflection as to whether it is truly in keeping with their explicitly stated religious beliefs. Over time I would not be surprised if the Creationist bent of the some of the laity percolates upward toward the Church Hierarchy (generally drawn from successful businessmen). The individualistic orientation of many American Roman Catholics also reflects their shaping by the American sociological landscape, and even relatively exotic religions like Islam are being stamped by the spirit of the times.

Update: Ex-Mormon A Clear Voice responds to my post. The response implies that the move toward Creationism among Mormons might be the result of their move toward assimilation into self-identification as mainstream Christians. I would like to point out that that Creationism is only strongly identified with conservative Protestants. Most American Catholics and mainline Christians are theistic evolutionists. The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, historically related to the more numerous Mormons, has basically morphed into a moderate Protestant denomination for operational purposes. So the Mormon move toward Creationism is not just identification with Christianity and a shift away from their pride in deviance from the norms of worldwide Christian faith, but an identification with conservative Protestanism. Additionally, I would argue that Creationism is often relatively ancillary to conservative Protestant thought, that is, it is implied by their literalist beliefs, but, it is not a pillar of their faith. The Mormon shift toward implicit Creationism to me suggests that cultural undercurrents have reshaped the Latter Day Saints zeitgeist without their full knowledge.

A Clear Voice seems to put more emphasis on the hierarchy and a top-down concept of religious worldview. This certainly makes sense, and it is more appropriate in the Mormon context than in the Protestant one (where schism is socially acceptable and almost inevitable). It seems likely that structural constraints of Mormon theology might always prevent their full assimilation into the conservative Protestant subculture, for unlike the Reorganized Church of Latter Day Saints, Mormons reject the Trinity, a key item of belief for nearly all the world’s Christians. In contrast, Creationism is a point of commonality which is not obstructed by the peculiarity of the Mormon theology, a way to bridge the chasm between conservative Protestants and themselves.

Mormons are an important illustration of the salience of both explicit and implicit religious beliefs and doctrines in the shaping of a community.

1 – The growth of the Mormon religion in this period also was driven partly by conversion of non-Mormons who may not have shed all their prior preconceptions or values.

2 – Since Mormons do not have a professional priesthood I use the term loosely.

Posted by razib at 10:57 AM

Posted in Uncategorized