Ban whitey! Rachel Lucas has a nice rant about the group that wants to "abolish" the white race. This sentiment is pretty common among white liberals, and it all leaves me dismayed. I like diversity, and though mixed-race girls of European and black and European and Asian ancestry are cute enough, what would the world do without freckle-faced red-heads? I've only dated one red-head, but I can still dream, can't I? But in any case, I really thought it was going too far for me to object to this moronic movement-let a white person stand up for their own race for once. Godless adds: Rachel Lucas is a closeminded individual. Here's a sample:

Here's a suggestion for everybody: If you don't like me or my rants, just keep your trap shut. I don't care. I don't want to hear from you. You are a waste of my time. I want to hear from the people who AGREE with me. That's right. I want only praise and support.

Not the kind of site I would endorse. She's just as bad as WarBloggerWatch. Godless recants: Seems like Ms. Lucas is more reasonable than the above quotation would indicate. She says:

I was really tired of being insulted. NOT being disagreed with, but INSULTED. And I had a really bad week, and I just simply wrote a "rant". That's why I call them "rants" and not "articles", "news pieces", or "this is what YOU should think." My site is just something I do for fun and I got really pissed off that one day, and I ranted. If you read through more of my site, the last thing you would call me is closeminded. I'm an agnostic, pro-choice, pro-immigration, open-to-debate libertarian/republican. I have a feedback form asking people to tell me if they don't like my site and why. And I write back to every single person who fills out that form or e-mails me, and if they disagree with me, I don't tell them to ram it. I've even posted counter-rants to some of my rants in the past when I turned out to be wrong. See here for an example.

So since the above quote was not representative of Rachel's site, I retract my criticism.