A clarification of my position A friend brought to my attention that one of our links might have a link to an unsavory site. The site in question that I linked to has some good information. I expect our readers to be able to distinguish wheat from chaff. In the end, we are all a world wide web and connected somehow. A lot of people link to us courageously even though they might not agree with much of what we say-especially when it comes to race. We believe that we moot hard truths that need to be aired sooner than later, but we understand that we are in a minority position. Those who disagree with our position but link to us in the spirit of dialogue and free inquiry deserve our thanks. So to all of you out there, from me to you, thanks! You know who you are. Back to the initial point though, obviously I can't go through every link and check it for stuff beyond the pale of discourse down to the last page. I personally find violence beyond the pale of discourse and wouldn't link to any site advocating it. Also, I don't really like to spread bogus misinformation. But obviously other sites can link to who they may, and their opinions of any given site might be different. The area that we often veer into, race differences, is often filled with emotion, and yes, hatred. We want to stick our necks out and speak a bit more rationally about these issues. On the other hand, there are sites with political agendas that we might disagree with that do present some ideas that have merit on their own. The Nazis believed in the importance of genetics. And so do we. I've already spoken at length why we aren't Nazis, just as Left-liberals aren't Communists. Similarly, just because we share points of intersection with other sites, especially when it comes to factual issues that are generally not aired in mainstream avenues due to "political correctness," does not imply we endorse their whole program or who they may associate with. In the end, we are responsible for our acquaintances, but not our acquaintances' acquaintances. And of course, I think Joel is far more likely to be hunted down and shot in the back by someone paid by the RIAA and MPAA. May the angel of the lord watch your back my brother....