Substack cometh, and lo it is good. (Pricing)

Was H. luzonensis Denisovan?

Philippine Ayta possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world:

Multiple lines of evidence show that modern humans interbred with archaic Denisovans. Here, we report an account of shared demographic history between Australasians and Denisovans distinctively in Island Southeast Asia. Our analyses are based on ∼2.3 million genotypes from 118 ethnic groups of the Philippines, including 25 diverse self-identified Negrito populations, along with high-coverage genomes of Australopapuans and Ayta Magbukon Negritos. We show that Ayta Magbukon possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world—∼30%–40% greater than that of Australians and Papuans—consistent with an independent admixture event into Negritos from Denisovans. Together with the recently described Homo luzonensis, we suggest that there were multiple archaic species that inhabited the Philippines prior to the arrival of modern humans and that these archaic groups may have been genetically related. Altogether, our findings unveil a complex intertwined history of modern and archaic humans in the Asia-Pacific region, where distinct Islander Denisovan populations differentially admixed with incoming Australasians across multiple locations and at various points in time.

5 thoughts on “Was H. luzonensis Denisovan?

  1. That is what I thought when I first looked at the paper. But direct proof from Luzonensis DNA would be nice.

  2. Razib – you’ve written frequently in the past about settling of Sahul and Sundaland and the clines of Denisovan DNA. Would it be reasonable to suspect the Denisovans never crossed into Sahul but spread widely through east Sundaland? Australian Aborigines make it to southern Australia by 45,000 yr ago, and Philippino Negritos by 28,000 and encounter Denisovans?

  3. marcel has a good point. Just the other day I was thinking that there’s been quite a drop off in pepperblogging around here.

Comments are closed.