Probably the most famous Brazil American is Gisele Bündchen, erstwhile supermodel and ex-wife of Tom Brady. Bündchen is a German Brazilian, and all the media I see say she is purely German. She grew up in a predominantly German town in the southern state of Rio Grande do Sul, which is often contrasted with the black-dominated areas of northeastern Brazil. About 80% of people in Rio Grande do Sul identify as white, about 10% mixed-race, 5% black and the remaining 5% indigenous, Asian, etc.
These sorts of facts are often used to recapitulate American racial dynamics in Brazil, except here you have a black majority and a white majority, though the latter are still socially, culturally and economically dominant. This is in contrast to the model that Brazilians themselves promoted on the 20th century of being am multiracial and mixed-race society, albeit defined by a fair amount of naked anti-black bias.
The admixture plot shows that under “11,” sampled in the far southern Brazilian city of Pelotas, only a few individuals on the right portion of the distribution show trace amounts of non-European ancestry. The prevalence of low but widespread Amerindian ancestry is not surprising in Brazil, where the early European settlers seem to have absorbed the natives. Second, under “12” you see samples from the city of Salvador, where 80% of people identify as mixed-race or black. Here you see lots of African ancestry, but only the individuals at the far left of the distribution are as African as the average African American (the rightmost panel is from a central Brazilian city).
This pattern is even more clear on PCA:
What’s the takeway? By American standards most Brazilians are black, because they have African ancestry. This includes a majority of self-identified “white” Brazilians.
There are 20 million Hui people in China. These are traditionally Chinese-speaking Muslims. Though they are found in every region of China (and in the Chinese Diaspora), they are concentrated in the northwest, in Gansu and Ningxia in particular. Their origins have always been curious. They speak the local Chinese dialect, and look mostly Chinese, but they are traditional Muslims. Are they purely the descendants of local converts? The Hui do not believe so, and some of them physically do look more West Eurasian.
To investigate whether there was a sex-biased admixture in the history of NXH, we compared the admixture results obtained from autosomes, X chromosome, mtDNA, and Y chromosome. We estimated the admixture proportion assuming two major ancestral components, that is, western and eastern (fig. 3 and supplementary tables S2 and S3, Supplementary Material online). The estimated genetic contribution of the western ancestry into NXH was 8.6% for autosomes, 5.9% for X chromosome, 3.6% for mtDNA, and 39.3% for Y chromosome, respectively. The results of Y chromosome and mtDNA were consistent with the previous studies (Yao et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2019; Xie et al. 2019). Additionally, though the difference in genetic contribution was small, there was a significant difference in admixture proportions between autosomes and X chromosome (Student’s t-test, P<107−10−7). This pattern was consistent across different regions in Ningxia (fig. 3C). These results indicated that the admixture of NXH was sex biased to the combination of Eastern females and Western males.
The 39% western Y chromosomes is key. This is probably a floor for the fraction of originally Muslim lineages. The Hui likely had Iranian and Turkic precursors, and the latter would have had eastern Y chromosomes. But the point is that cultural continuity was maintained in paternal lineage systems, and over the generations intermarriage with local Han women resulted in 90% of the genome being replaced over time.
This is a common pattern in large parts of the world. Paternal cultural transmission is a thing.
The history of the British Isles and Ireland is characterized by multiple periods of major cultural change, including the influential transformation after the end of Roman rule, which precipitated shifts in language, settlement patterns and material culture…The extent to which migration from continental Europe mediated these transitions is a matter of long-standing debate…Here we study genome-wide ancient DNA from 460 medieval northwestern Europeans—including 278 individuals from England—alongside archaeological data, to infer contemporary population dynamics. We identify a substantial increase of continental northern European ancestry in early medieval England, which is closely related to the early medieval and present-day inhabitants of Germany and Denmark, implying large-scale substantial migration across the North Sea into Britain during the Early Middle Ages. As a result, the individuals who we analysed from eastern England derived up to 76% of their ancestry from the continental North Sea zone, albeit with substantial regional variation and heterogeneity within sites. We show that women with immigrant ancestry were more often furnished with grave goods than women with local ancestry, whereas men with weapons were as likely not to be of immigrant ancestry. A comparison with present-day Britain indicates that subsequent demographic events reduced the fraction of continental northern European ancestry while introducing further ancestry components into the English gene pool, including substantial southwestern European ancestry most closely related to that seen in Iron Age France
1) More migration than earlier papers. Looks like increasing ancient DNA coverage helped 2) 75% Y chromosomal turnover in eastern England 3) A third component, detected in the PoBI paper, is confirmed, and seems related to continuous later gene flow from northern France. This is ubiquitous across England, and I do wonder now what the Norman Conquest and the unification of large regions of northern France with England did in the early medieval period
By sequencing 727 ancient individuals from the Southern Arc (Anatolia and its neighbors in Southeastern Europe and West Asia) over 10,000 years, we contextualize its Chalcolithic period and Bronze Age (about 5000 to 1000 BCE), when extensive gene flow entangled it with the Eurasian steppe. Two streams of migration transmitted Caucasus and Anatolian/Levantine ancestry northward, and the Yamnaya pastoralists, formed on the steppe, then spread southward into the Balkans and across the Caucasus into Armenia, where they left numerous patrilineal descendants. Anatolia was transformed by intra–West Asian gene flow, with negligible impact of the later Yamnaya migrations. This contrasts with all other regions where Indo-European languages were spoken, suggesting that the homeland of the Indo-Anatolian language family was in West Asia, with only secondary dispersals of non-Anatolian Indo-Europeans from the steppe.
Literary and archaeological sources have preserved a rich history of Southern Europe and West Asia since the Bronze Age that can be complemented by genetics. Mycenaean period elites in Greece did not differ from the general population and included both people with some steppe ancestry and others, like the Griffin Warrior, without it. Similarly, people in the central area of the Urartian Kingdom around Lake Van lacked the steppe ancestry characteristic of the kingdom’s northern provinces. Anatolia exhibited extraordinary continuity down to the Roman and Byzantine periods, with its people serving as the demographic core of much of the Roman Empire, including the city of Rome itself. During medieval times, migrations associated with Slavic and Turkic speakers profoundly affected the region.
We present the first ancient DNA data from the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of Mesopotamia (Southeastern Turkey and Northern Iraq), Cyprus, and the Northwestern Zagros, along with the first data from Neolithic Armenia. We show that these and neighboring populations were formed through admixture of pre-Neolithic sources related to Anatolian, Caucasus, and Levantine hunter-gatherers, forming a Neolithic continuum of ancestry mirroring the geography of West Asia. By analyzing Pre-Pottery and Pottery Neolithic populations of Anatolia, we show that the former were derived from admixture between Mesopotamian-related and local Epipaleolithic-related sources, but the latter experienced additional Levantine-related gene flow, thus documenting at least two pulses of migration from the Fertile Crescent heartland to the early farmers of Anatolia.
I haven’t read the supplements, so no major comment from me, except for one: the Greece-focused paper confirms using phenotypic prediction that West Eurasians have been getting lighter-complected since the late Neolithic/Bronze Age. I have no idea why, but some Nazis are offended by this reality and cherry-pick data, but trust me, I open up all the supplements to look at the HIRIS-plex predictions.
Nick Patterson has responded on his Substack to the NYRB piece Why Biology is not Destiny, which itself is an attack on Kathryn Paige Harden’s book The Genetic Lottery. Patterson does not say anything you can’t find in Stuart Ritchie’s defense, but he is at this stage in his career a very eminent scholar operating from a perch in one of the world’s most prominent population genetics laboratories. So him speaking publically is worthwhile in my opinion, since a lot of this is going to shake out in credential thumping and status signaling (Marcus Feldman in particular is a massive deal in population genetics so it needs to be responded to those in senior positions)…
In the recent film The Northman the protagonist, Amleth, has a romantic relationship with a woman, “Olga of the Birch Forest.” Amleth was a Viking who raided Kievan Rus, and Olga was a Slavic woman who was captured in a raid.
Birch trees flourish across the temperate zone, but they’re particularly dominant in the north, due to being hardier. When I wrote about Finnish genetics, history and culture last year I stumbled upon the fact that early Finns who arrived in America (usually they were identified as “Swedes” because they were ruled by the Swedish Crown) often found an immediate affinity with northern Native American tribes. One explanation is that Finns and northern Native Americans are both “birch forest people.” Many aspects of their culture were similar, down to their moccasins.
As it happens, a long long time ago, and far far away, my forefathers were also birch forest people. Long before Olga’s kith and kin occupied the birch forests of northwestern Russia, they were occupied by the Fantyanovo-Balanovo culture. Until recently this cattle-raising society on the northern edge of the Indo-European world was assumed to perhaps be Baltic-speaking due to local hydronyms, but ancient DNA retrieved from Fatyanovo-Balanovo suggests a different answer. The vast majority of the men in their burial grounds carry Y chromosomal haplogroup R1a-Z93. This lineage is now found overwhelmingly in Indo-Iranian people, as well as in the Altai region.
The ancient DNA transect and succession is clear – Fatnyanovo-Balanovo expanded eastward – Turned into the Abashevo copper miners west of the Urals – Gave rise to the Sintashta on the southern slope of the Urals into northwest Kazakhstan
At this point the Sintashta around 2000 BC exploded and turned into the Andronovo Horizon that covered much of Central Eurasia between 2000 and 1500 BC:
At some point Olga of the Birch Forest was left behind. A recent paper estimates that about 8% of the mtDNA lineages among populations like the Kalash and Pashtun in northern Pakistan is of steppe provenance. This is in contrast to about 2% to the south and east in “mainland” South Asia. This is contrast to the frequency of R1a in this region of Pakistan, about 50%, and 25% in mainland South Asia. In terms of total genome ancestry, about 25-30% of the ancestry in northern Pakistan among these groups is steppe, with an average across the subcontinent a bit below 15% (I did a weighted calculation a while ago).
What you see here is a massive drop off in maternal lineages of steppe Indo-Iranians, and a strong persistence of Y chromosomes, with total genome content being about in the middle. Figure 4c of Narasimhan et al. shows the same thing, with R1a fractions way higher than total genome content of steppe heritage.
This sex-specific admixture is not limited to South Asia. It can be found in the European context as well, though rarely as extreme.
So what’s going on here? One thing to note about Indo-European people is that on the whole they are patrilineal and patrilocal and exogamous. That is, one’s identity was determined by one’s father. Women moved into the household’s of their husband, and tended to be unrelated to them. This seems to be a perfect recipe for the assimilation of women into a society. But that’s not the reason all of these culturally and genetically different women are being brought into Indo-European societies. It is because the men are moving, and migrating very long distances.
In a podcast last year with myself and Patrick Wyman David Anthony claimed that they have detected Yamnaya individuals buried in western Mongolia and in Europe who are clearly related to each other. This means that Yamnaya cultural and social networks spanned Eurasia due to their mobility. In The Northman Olga was shipped from Russia all the way to Iceland. But this was the exception, not the rule. As Indo-European men expanded out of the core Eurasia zone, they moved as bachelor groups, and assimilated local women.
And not just Indo-Europeans. Among Uralic people, as well as some Siberians, a particular Y chromosome is very dominant from the Baltic all the way to eastern Siberia.
It’s a branch of N, and it is clearly East Asian in origin. It seems to have shown up in the Baltic region about 2,500 years ago, and it’s now the dominant haplogroup in Finland, and the Baltic countries. And yet the total genome content of modern day Finns that is East Asian is about 5% or so, even if N3a (TAT-C) is about 70%. There are almost no Siberian mtDNA lineages among Finns (OK ~1%). Among the Saami, about 25% of the genome is Siberian, but less than 10% of the mtDNA. Just like the Indo-Europeans, there seems to have been a male-mediated migration west. Why didn’t they bring women?
Can you imagine women and children moving fast across the zone of Eurasia north of the birch forest???
I think the common thing that connects the Indo-European groups here and the Uralic people is that there was a period when they were highly mobile over very long distances. This does not mean that women and children could never be involved. Some women were moving with their men judging by the mtDNA here and there. But, on the whole these were strongly male biased migrations. These were young and robust groups of men with few ties that moved rapidly across territory. There wasn’t time or inclination to have a baggage train.
Another way to look at it is from the gene’s-eye first view. Let’s look for explosive punctuated clusters within haplogroups.
Today is “DNA Day,” I checked Nebula Genomics website to see if there was a deal. So I got the 30x whole genome sequencing for $199+$24.99/month subscription. The deal is you have to get the subscription, but you can cancel at any time. What I plan to do is just download my data when the results come back and the subscription starts ticking, and cancel after that. The other options are more expensive. But, they won’t let you add more than 1 item unless you get the most expensive upfront deal, so what I did was just started separate carts and sent the order to separate email addresses.
And yes, I have my own DNA sequenced. This is for friends and family.
If you want to download my whole genome sequence, from raw reads to bam files to vcf’s, go here.
Update: It was pointed out to me that quarterly would charge $75 as it will be $25 per month quarterly (3 months).
The Avars settled the Carpathian Basin in 567/68 CE, establishing an empire lasting over 200 years. Who they were and where they came from is highly debated. Contemporaries have disagreed about whether they were, as they claimed, the direct successors of the Mongolian Steppe Rouran empire that was destroyed by the Turks in ∼550 CE. Here, we analyze new genome-wide data from 66 pre-Avar and Avar-period Carpathian Basin individuals, including the 8 richest Avar-period burials and further elite sites from Avar’s empire core region. Our results provide support for a rapid long-distance trans-Eurasian migration of Avar-period elites. These individuals carried Northeast Asian ancestry matching the profile of preceding Mongolian Steppe populations, particularly a genome available from the Rouran period. Some of the later elite individuals carried an additional non-local ancestry component broadly matching the steppe, which could point to a later migration or reflect greater genetic diversity within the initial migrant population.
No big surprises, but I think it is important to note that it looks like the East Eurasian Avar elites brought a lot of Iranian-steppe people as cadet elites. So a lot of the elite non-East Eurasian ancestry turns out to be non-European, and more Central Eurasian (probably Alanic and the like).
We developed a novel method for efficiently estimating time-varying selection coefficients from genome-wide ancient DNA data. In simulations, our method accurately recovers selective trajectories, and is robust to mis-specification of population size. We applied it to a large dataset of ancient and present-day human genomes from Britain, and identified seven loci with genome-wide significant evidence of selection in the past 4500 years. Almost all of them are related to increased vitamin D or calcium levels, and we conclude that lack of vitamin D and consequent low calcium was consistently the most important selective pressure in Britain since the Bronze Age. However, the strength of selection on individual loci varied substantially over time, suggesting that cultural or environmental factors moderated the genetic response to this pressure. Of 28 complex anthropometric and metabolic traits, skin pigmentation was the only one with significant evidence of polygenic selection, further underscoring the importance of phenotypes related to vitamin D. Our approach illustrates the power of ancient DNA to characterize selection in human populations and illuminates the recent evolutionary history of Britain.
If you read this blog closely over the years you will know that I’ve noticed that the ancient DNA has yielded the general result that Bronze Age Europeans were somewhat darker in complexion than their modern descendants. This is without mass overall population genetic change in many areas. This is not always statistically significant, but you can tell a likelihood before something hits p = 0.05.
The ancient DNA temporal transects are pretty good for Britain. The best in Europe. And the above preprint seems to present a strong result of depigmentation over the last 4,500 years in Britain using powerful new methods drawing on ancient DNA sources. I strongly suspect this generalizes to much of Northern Europe.