Substack cometh, and lo it is good. (Pricing)

Where the Whiter Folk Are

Today I combined some Census data with 2008 election results (thanks Cosma). Though Barack Obama won the vote last fall, he lost the Non-Hispanic white vote. It stands to reason then that the whiter and less Hispanic a county is, the more likely it would be to tilt McCain. I was curious as to geographic variation within this general rule-of-thumb. So I plotted the % who voted for Obama in a county vs. the % who were Non-Hispanic whites (according to the 2000 Census*). I then generated a line of best fit via loess, and used the deviations from the trend to generate a map shaded proportionately. In other words, the bluer a county is the more it voted for Obama above expectation based on the overall relationship of the % white Non-Hispanic within a county and vote for Obama (the converse for red naturally). Again, click the map for the larger image.

I also decided to constrain the data set to those counties which were at minimum 80% Non-Hispanic white. Mostly because the “Black Belt” counties are showing up on the above map.

Finally, a shaded map of the results.

1) Don’t mess with Texas Obama. Despite Obama winning the Hispanic counties in the South, those counties are always underperforming relative to other majority-minority districts. Since some of those counties are 90% Hispanic it probably isn’t just Non-Hispanic white swing in the other direction.

2) Though Obama lost much of the rural North and East, he overperformed when you use the whole nation as a reference point, in particular rural areas in the West and South.

3) Pennsylvania kind of does look like Pittsburgh + Philadelphia, with Alabama in the middle.

4) Obama did well in Greater New England. Less well in the Butternut Region of the southern Midwest settled from the South.

Here are a list of the 200 counties furthest from the trendlines. The first 100 are the most pro-Obama above expectation when the predictor is Non-Hispanic white %. The last 100 the most pro-McCain.

Deviation From Trend Line% For ObamaCounty & State
0.40.78Marin, California
0.390.77Multnomah, Imbler
0.380.78Santa Cruz, California
0.380.77San Miguel, Colorado
0.360.74Sonoma, California
0.360.75Dukes, Massachusetts
0.350.75Berkshire, Massachusetts
0.350.74Pitkin, Colorado
0.340.73Dane, Wisconsin
0.340.72Orange, North Carolina
0.340.72Boulder, Colorado
0.330.73Windham, Vermont
0.330.73Franklin, Massachusetts
0.330.72Hampshire, Massachusetts
0.320.7Washtenaw, Michigan
0.320.7Mendocino, California
0.320.7King, Washington
0.310.71Lamoille, Vermont
0.310.84San Francisco, California
0.310.7New Castle, Delaware
0.310.7Johnson, Iowa
0.310.69Tompkins, New York
0.30.7Washington, Vermont
0.30.7San Juan, Washington
0.30.69Imbler, Wisconsin
0.30.77Suffolk, Massachusetts
0.30.83Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
0.30.72Arlington, Virginia
0.30.69Windsor, Vermont
0.290.69Addison, Vermont
0.290.69Silver Bow, Montana
0.290.68Nantucket, Massachusetts
0.290.72Montgomery, Maryland
0.290.69Cuyahoga, Ohio
0.280.68Chittenden, Vermont
0.280.66Ingham, Michigan
0.280.66Ramsey, Minnesota
0.280.75Denver, Colorado
0.280.67Iowa, Wisconsin
0.280.67Camden, New Jersey
0.270.67Deer Lodge, Montana
0.270.66Summit, Colorado
0.270.66Blaine, Idaho
0.270.65Lucas, Ohio
0.270.65Genesee, Michigan
0.270.65Hartford, Connecticut
0.270.66Monroe, Indiana
0.270.66Jefferson, Washington
0.270.66Bennington, Vermont
0.260.66Athens, Ohio
0.260.76Durham, North Carolina
0.260.66Douglas, Wisconsin
0.260.68Milwaukee, Wisconsin
0.260.67Mercer, New Jersey
0.260.65Benton, Oregon
0.260.76Cook, Illinois
0.260.64Hennepin, Minnesota
0.260.64Muskegon, Michigan
0.260.65Napa, California
0.260.64Middlesex, Massachusetts
0.260.64Douglas, Kansas
0.260.77Santa Fe, New Mexico
0.260.74Wayne, Michigan
0.260.6
5
Orange, Vermont
0.260.74San Mateo, California
0.250.65St. Louis, Minnesota
0.250.64Hood River, Oregon
0.250.63Humboldt, California
0.250.63Albany, New York
0.250.64Bayfield, Wisconsin
0.250.64Marion, Indiana
0.250.64Rock, Wisconsin
0.250.67Lake, Indiana
0.250.79Alameda, California
0.240.64Cumberland, Maine
0.240.68Contra Costa, California
0.240.83Clayton, Georgia
0.240.62Mahoning, Ohio
0.240.62Rock Island, Illinois
0.240.62Hampden, Massachusetts
0.240.63Lane, Oregon
0.240.63Trempealeau, Wisconsin
0.240.63Carlton, Minnesota
0.240.63Cheshire, New Hampshire
0.240.63Grand Isle, Vermont
0.230.63Crawford, Wisconsin
0.230.63Orleans, Vermont
0.230.63Gunnison, Colorado
0.230.63Lackawanna, Pennsylvania
0.230.63Grafton, New Hampshire
0.230.63Portage, Wisconsin
0.230.63Routt, Colorado
0.230.67Broward, Florida
0.230.65Clarke, Georgia
0.230.62Palm Beach, Florida
0.230.61New Haven, Connecticut
0.230.61Eagle, Colorado
0.230.62Howard, Iowa
0.230.62Jackson, Iowa
0.230.62Green, Wisconsin
-0.220.26Ector, Texas
-0.220.18Kiowa, Kansas
-0.220.18Sioux, Iowa
-0.220.18Piute, Utah
-0.220.18Cleburne, Alabama
-0.220.18Brantley, Georgia
-0.220.18Campbell, Wyoming
-0.220.24Upton, Texas
-0.220.27Seward, Kansas
-0.220.16Wichita, Kansas
-0.220.25Ward, Texas
-0.220.17Donley, Texas
-0.220.16Morton, Kansas
-0.220.17Alfalfa, Oklahoma
-0.220.17Holmes, Florida
-0.220.17Rock, Nebraska
-0.220.17Leslie, Kentucky
-0.220.24Winkler, Texas
-0.220.17Box Elder, Utah
-0.220.17Hooker, Nebraska
-0.220.16Jack, Texas
-0.220.17Crook, Wyoming
-0.220.17Morgan, Utah
-0.230.17Bear Lake, Idaho
-0.230.17Cullman, Alabama
-0.230.17Archer, Texas
-0.230.17Caribou, Idaho
-0.230.17Sevier, Utah
-0.230.16Kingfisher, Oklahoma
-0.230.15Hutchinson, Texas
-0.230.37Pecos, Texas
-0.230.16Jefferson, Idaho
-0.230.16George, Mississippi
-0.230.16Duchesne, Utah
-0.230.16Sterling, Texas
-0.230.16Millard, Utah
-0.230.16Carter, Montana
-0.230.16Roger Mills, Oklahoma
-0.230.16Dewey, Oklahoma
-0.230.21Garza, Texas
-0.240.16Banks, Georgia
-0.240.16Sioux, Nebraska
-0.240.16Dawson, Georgia
-0.240.16Logan, Kansas
-0.240.16Cameron, Louisiana
-0.240.16Haakon, South Dakota
-0.240.17Clark, Idaho
-0.240.14Gray, Texas
-0.240.14Hemphill, Texas
-0.240.14Wheeler, Texas
-0.240.15Garfield, Montana
-0.240.15Loving, Texas
-0.240.15Glascock, Georgia
-0.240.15Rich, Utah
-0.240.15McPherson, Nebraska
-0.250.27Hale, Texas
-0.250.15Blount, Alabama
-0.250.15Hayes, Nebraska
-0.250.14Uintah, Utah
-0.250.15Scott, Kansas
-0.250.15Arthur, Nebraska
-0.250.15Ellis, Oklahoma
-0.250.15Major, Oklahoma
-0.250.14Sherman, Texas
-0.250.15Banner, Nebraska
-0.250.15Texas, Oklahoma
-0.250.13Hartley, Texas
-0.250.13Stevens, Kansas
-0.250.22Crane, Texas
-0.250.14Blaine, Nebraska
-0.250.14Jackson, Kentucky
-0.250.14Carson, Texas
-0.250.28Dawson, Texas
-0.250.14Shackelford, Texas
-0.260.14Harper, Oklahoma
-0.260.12Lipscomb, Texas
-0.260.12Cimarron, Oklahoma
-0.260.24Sutton, Texas
-0.260.16Gaines, Texas
-0.260.13Thomas, Nebraska
-0.260.18Martin, Texas
-0.270.13Armstrong, Texas
-0.270.13Livingston, Louisiana
-0.270.11Motley, Texas
-0.270.11Oldham, Texas
-0.270.21Moore, Texas
-0.270.11Borden, Texas
-0.280.12Wallace, Kansas
-0.280.17Andrews, Texas
-0.280.12Franklin, Idaho
-0.280.12Madison, Idaho
-0.280.11Beaver, Oklahoma
-0.280.11Grant, Nebraska
-0.290.11Hansford, Texas
-0.290.26Deaf Smith, Texas
-0.30.19Parmer, Texas
-0.30.09Glasscock, Texas
-0.310.2Reagan, Texas
-0.320.08Roberts, Texas
-0.320.08Ochiltree, Texas
-0.340.05King, Texas

* This is 8 years out of date, but by far the most complete and precise data set until the 2010 Census.

Posted in Uncategorized

Comments are closed.